Lilian Abou-Tabickh, PhD

Arabic Political Thought | Feminist Thought

What Does Ibn Khaldūn Mean by the Term Mādda? On Human Association and Political-Economic Organisation


Journal article


Lilian Abou-Tabickh
Al-Masāq: Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean, vol. 34(3), 2022, pp. 256-275


Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Abou-Tabickh, L. (2022). What Does Ibn Khaldūn Mean by the Term Mādda? On Human Association and Political-Economic Organisation. Al-Masāq: Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean, 34(3), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110.2022.2051391


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Abou-Tabickh, Lilian. “What Does Ibn Khaldūn Mean by the Term Mādda? On Human Association and Political-Economic Organisation.” Al-Masāq: Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean 34, no. 3 (2022): 256–275.


MLA   Click to copy
Abou-Tabickh, Lilian. “What Does Ibn Khaldūn Mean by the Term Mādda? On Human Association and Political-Economic Organisation.” Al-Masāq: Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean, vol. 34, no. 3, 2022, pp. 256–75, doi:10.1080/09503110.2022.2051391.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{lilian2022a,
  title = {What Does Ibn Khaldūn Mean by the Term Mādda? On Human Association and Political-Economic Organisation},
  year = {2022},
  issue = {3},
  journal = {Al-Masāq: Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean},
  pages = {256-275},
  volume = {34},
  doi = {10.1080/09503110.2022.2051391},
  author = {Abou-Tabickh, Lilian}
}

ABSTRACT
Preeminent interpreters of Al-Muqaddima situate Ibn Khaldūn’s thought within ancient philosophy based on philosophical terminology that appears in the text. In this essay, I argue that in the context of ʿilm al-ʿumrān, Ibn Khaldūn does not use the term “matter” in the philosophical-metaphysical sense of natural philosophy, but in an economic sense to mean money. This interpretation is based on Ibn Khaldūn’s philosophy of language, rhetorical style and historical method. Attention to how he uses language to communicate his ideas shows that, throughout Al-Muqaddima, Ibn Khaldūn presents arguments based on religious law and tradition, theology and philosophy. However, in constructing his new science, he uses an intellectual method that is based on worldly and demonstrative factors, one of which is money. Money is one of the two foundations of the polity. This interpretation severs the connection to natural philosophy and challenges the natural-cyclical view of his historical-political thought.